Archive | Lab Animal Life Stories RSS feed for this section

Pig-Tailed Macaque, #J92476

11 Jan

In Memory of : Male, Pig-Tailed Macaque, #J92476

Born: November 16, 1992
Died: ?

J92476 was born a long way from his native homeland. He was born in Medical Lake, Washington at a human prison remodeled into a monkey breeding center and renamed the Primate Field Station, but now abandoned.

On November 16, 1992, when J92476 was born, he weighed 0.485 kilograms, not quite a pound. The notation on his Birth Record says, “Kid looks good. Dam [mother] doing well.”

On the day he was born he was classified as “research reserve.”

On May 1, 1993, at the age of 51 months, he was reclassified as “research.”

He was taken from his mother on July 28, 1993; the reason given is “standard protocol.” He was about eight and a half months old. Living at the Primate Field Station held advantages for some of the monkeys living there, such as the relatively long time J92476 was left with his mother. The Field Station had its problems as well though. Monkeys who had been left exposed to the elements died as a result. Others at the Field Station had died of thirst. WaRPRC was even once fined for the conditions at the Field Station, which is amazing considering what is done legally to the animals on a daily basis.

On October 21, 1993, J92476 was assigned to a study being conducted by William A. Morton titled “HIV-1/MN in M. nemistrina.”

William A. Morton was the director of WaNPRC.

Morton had twenty-one funded studies underway, a record perhaps, as of the year 2000, to infect monkeys from a variety of macaque species with HIV-1, HIV-2, a variety of SIVs, cloned SIVs, and lab-created SHIVs.

Simian immuno virus, or SIV, is a retrovirus like HIV, but unlike HIV, causes illness and death in some macaque species. SIV is not harmful, generally, in its naturally occurring host species. It causes illness only when experimentally, or accidentally, as in the artificial mixed species colonies such as are maintained at the large primate facilities, transferred to susceptible species.

Since the time SIV has been the subject of research, primate labs have produced very many varieties of the virus. SIV has a propensity to mutate as it passages through a new host. This has created a wealth of opportunity for researchers to repeat experiments with ever-new strains.

As research into SIV has progressed it seems to have become apparent that what was being learned about SIV was informing researchers about HIV in humans in only a general sense, SIV in a macaque is a different disease in a different species. SIV in the susceptible macaque species appears even to be a poor tool for understanding why SIV is not harmful to all macaque species.

This frustration with being unable to apply what was being learned about SIV to HIV led to the creation of SHIV, a sort of hybrid of the two viruses created in the lab, and never before seen on the planet. This new disease is deadly to some macaque species. Documentation of the deaths of these monkeys has been no more productive with regard to HIV, than has the earlier and ongoing experiments using SIV.

Writing in a research abstract specifically investigating the various responses to the viruses in different species, Morton wrote, “After intravenous inoculation with 1,000 TCID of virus (equivalent to 100 animal infectious doses in M. nemestrina), M. fascicularis became infected and showed depletion of circulating CD4+ cells similar to M. nemestrina. The virus also infected M. mulatta, but at much lower levels, and there was no evidence of pathogenesis…. A third experiment … [attempted to ascertain] the minimal infectious dose for intrarectal inoculation. Two M. nemestrina were inoculated with 1000 TCID intrarectally; two others were inoculated with 10 TCID. One of the pair inoculated at the higher dose became infected, and neither of the pair inoculated at the lower dose was infected.”

From October 21, 1993, until February 2, 1995, J92476 was assigned to four separate Morton studies on “HIV” but seems to have escaped without life-threatening illness. As of January 2000, J92476 had had blood drawn for research 104 times.

But in spite of this run of luck, getting to remain with his mother for a while, escaping experimental death, his lot has been less than comfortable and not without difficulty.

September 1, 1994: “Left arm caught above elbow. Sedated with Ketamine and wire bars cut to release animal. Moderate edema of forearm. Doesn’t require pressure bandage. Mild abrasions of upper arm. No fractures. Observe for next 24 hrs.”

On December 7, 1994, J92476 was seen by veterinary staff again. He was just over two years old:

“Animal prolapses rectum when stressed. [unclear] spontaneously. No sign of traumatic injury or infection. Anal sphincter muscle is stretched allowing rectum to prolapse. Purse string suture in anus. Remove on Dec. 12. Monitor stool production.”

December 8: “Very stressed when being observed to the point that it vomits. Suture intact. Very small pieces of feces under cage. Animal may be having trouble defecating. If animal isn’t passing normal amounts of stool on 12/9 – re-do suture.”

December 9: “Passing stools. Suture intact.”

December 10: “Passing normal stool. Suture intact.”

December 11: “Passing small amounts normal stool. Suture intact.”

December 12: “No stool in pan” [Then this entry is crossed out and a note written above it: “Don just cleaned. Lots of stool reportedly in pan prior to cleaning.” Entry continues: “Small amount of dried feces on anus. Suture may be too tight and preventing normal passing of feces. Ketamine sedation. Removed suture. Anus is reddened and irritated. Leave suture out. If animal prolapses return – re-suture or consider intra abdominal imbrication.”

December 13: “Normal stools. Sphincter muscle appears to be holding. No need to replace suture. Observe for three days for signs of recurring anal prolapse.”

December 14: “Stools normal. No rectal prolapse. No further need to observe. Resolve case.”

On December 21, 1994, J92476 was again admitted for rectal prolapse. The purse string suture procedure on his sphincter was repeated and he was released from the veterinary unit on January 3, 1995.

Only two weeks later, on January 17, the following entry was made: “During morning rounds observed animal looked dehydrated, lethargic – had irritated eyes – checked Lixit [the automatic water tube] – was not working – gave animal water in bowl and small amounts of fruit – animal was eager to eat and drink – continued to give animal small amounts of water and fruit through out the day.”

January 18: Animal doing much better – hydration almost normal – gave water/juice and fruit – doing well – continue under observation and will offer extra fruit and fluids as needed – animal is active and alert.”

On March 20, 1995, J92476 underwent surgery to turn him into one of Dr. Morton’s living laboratories. He had a stomach catheter implanted. The tube ran under his skin and exited through his back for attachment to a tether.

Tethering monkeys in laboratories is common. Typically they are placed in a vest or jacket that shields the tubes coming from their bodies from their efforts to pull the tubes out. Monkeys on tethers are always housed alone. This individual housing – essentially a form of solitary confinement – is a known cause for such severe mental stress that monkeys commonly develop self-mutilating behaviors as a result.

March 27: “Animal inoculation performed. Experimental drug or substance. HIV-2/287.” This was injected intravenously.

“Experimental procedure from 27-Mar-95 to 17-Jul-95: Administration of medication: Gastric lavage performed. Experimental drug or substance. Administration of antiviral drug D4T via gastrostomy tube.”

On March 20, a comment regarding another monkey (serial number obliterated) being subjected to the same procedure was made: “Observed animal in cage with possible skin erosion caused by tether jacket belt being too tight – sedated animal – removed jacket – animal had erosion site on abdomen of approx. 2 inches wide by 4 inches – shaved area, cleaned with Betadyne – applied wound powder topically to area – animal seems thin, 100 mg Iron 1cc B Complex – jacket was not replaced.”

On March 30, a swab of J92476’s rectum was taken.

On April 30, 1995, J92476 was reported to have diarrhea and found to have a bacterial infection of the intestine.

July 17: The tether was disconnected and the catheter was removed.

It is worth noting that the two year period from January 18, 1995 until December 3, 1996 the daily records for J92476 are missing. The information mentioned herein for that period was gleaned from the Master History Report and various veterinary reports.

The first of a more detailed history begins again on November 25, 1996, nine days after J92476’s fourth birthday. He is reported to have a “lacerated/crushed 2nd digit, Rt hand. The bone is reported to be broken. First aid is given and amputation is suggested as a possible course of action.”

November 26: “No amputation required.”

November 28: “Animal had removed bandage and injured thumb of same hand. Significant abrasion on the back of his thumb.

December 1: “Sedated to change bandage. Wound fairly clean, but no reduction in swelling from [unclear] injury, (Bone still Broken!)” [The rest of the entry is unclear.]

December 2: “Agitated. Gave 0.25 cc Ketofen; sedated with Ketamine/Rompun. Amputated digit to joint P-2; Sutured w/ 2-0 Dexon…”

December 3: “Animal eaten through bandage. Distal end swollen. Applied wound powder and [unclear] gauze. (No Telfa pads).”

December 4: “Bandage removed and the animal has pulled out the sutures.” The wounds were re-sutured and a new bandage applied.

On December 5 they taped an egg carton on his hand in place of the bandage.

J92476 is treated with antibiotics for the next few days. On December 10 an entry says that the bandage is now off and the wound looks “ok.”

On December 11, it is noted that his finger is dry and that no bone is exposed.

He was discharged on the 13th and a follow up entry on December 18 reports that his finger “has healed well.”

March 2, 1997: “Soles of both feet are dry, flaky – “athletes foot” – in appearance. Hands are moist, normal – no drying. After scrubbing… the pads are clean, but deep cracks are inflamed. Monkey does not seem to favor feet. Walks normally. Will watch.”

May 17, 1997: “Bld seen in cage & on left hand. Skin flap on palm of left hand.” Treated with antibiotic and bandaged.

May 18: Part of the bandage has been torn away.

On May 23, J92476’s wound seems to be mostly healed.

There is another missing period of records.

June 20, 1998: “6:00 P.M. Sedated with .6 Ketamine. Prolapse. Went back in after clean and lub [?]. Rectal prolapse of about 1 — 3 inch sticking out. Flushed and cleaned w/ sodium chloride solution. Lubed & placed back in. Watch for reoccurrence & diarrhea next 24-48 hrs.”

On June 21 1998: A stool specimen is sent to the lab. The results show he is infected with two types of Staphylococcus and E. coli, but this is considered not to be related to his prolapsed rectum.

June 21: “Noted re-prolapesd this A.M. Called doctor on call. Decided to put in ‘purse string’. To start on Ketofen 35 mg. BID IM. Sedated at 10 A.M. w/ 60 mg Ketamine & 30 mg Atropine. 1 — 3 inch colon sticking back out. Flushed and cleaned w/ NaCl. Lubed & pushed back in. Placed 3-0 Dermalon suture within anus. Remove suture in 3-4 days.

June 22: “Normal stool production / volume. Purse string intact in rectal mucocutaneous junction. Patient irritated w/ suture & self-examines rectum frequently on observation. Noted small amount rectal mucosa protruding. Patient interested in grooming but also paces in cage frequently.”

June 23: “Stools normal. Patient presented @ cage front for grooming. Slight rectal prolapse of healthy rectal mucosa protruding. Patient appears to have removed purse-string. Will update PI [principal investigator, the researcher who has permission to experiment on J92476] 6/24 after observation status.”

June 24: “No time for work-up today. ~1/2 inch protrusion rectal mucosa persists w/ stools.”

June 25: “Rectal prolapse not evident today but patient still self-examining. Normal stools.”

June 26: “1/2 inch prolapse rectal mucosa noted…”

June 27: “~1/2 rectal prolapse noted…”

June 28: “Continue Ketoprofen.”

June 29: “No signs of rectal prolapse. Patient pacing in cage & approached for grooming.”

June 30: “Small rectal prolapse. Normal consistency and volume of stools. Concerned about recurrence of prolapse in face of Ketaprofen to reduce cellulites.”

July 1: Note prolapse on rounds ~ 3 pm. Prolapse protruding ~1 inch, appears intact mucosa [with] no abrasions. Normal volume and consistency of stools.

Late that day, J92476 underwent surgery for his prolapse rectum.

July 2: “Normal stool, animal somewhat depressed, but appetite seems fine.”

July 3: “Animal alert, good appetite & normal stool.”

July 4: “No stool noted in A.M. Eating. Cont. Ketoprofen.”

July 5: “Removed purse string. No swelling evident.”

July 6: “Animal alert good appetite.”

J92476 seemed to be recovering for the next few days. He was eating and reported as being alert. On the 8th he was reported to have an increased pinkness to his face.

July 9: “Rectal prolapse ~1/2 inch noted. Stools continue to be stable. Mucosa appears clean & no signs proctitis. No redness to face.”

July 10: “Rectal prolapse 1 inch noted.” Again, J92476 was operated on for his anal prolapse. Another purse string suture procedure was performed and more swaps sent to the lab for analysis.

[It is worth noting that the same people who are having so much difficulty curing J92476’s prolapsing rectum are the very same people claiming to be curing human disease by causing monkeys to become ill in ways that seem to mimic human illnesses.]

The purse string holds for the next few days. On July 15, J92476 is reported to have soft stool and almost none on the 16th. He is also reported to be starting to pull at the knot of the suture in his anus.

On the 22nd someone finally sees the suture again and it seems to be holding; his anus has not prolapsed.

For the rest of the month J92476 seems to be reasonably well. The suture is not removed because he seems to have removed it himself. One entry, from the 28th notes: “Normal-sized feces, purse string suture gone. No signs rectal prolapse. Normal friendly mannerisms.” The pinkness to his face seems to persist.

July 31: Normal mannerisms. Noted new rectal prolapse.

J92476 underwent another surgery for the prolapse. While anesthetized, he also had a salve applied to his reddened elbows, stomach and thighs. He also had his teeth cleaned.

August 11: “Patient relocated to cage #9 from #24 today per research staff to help decrease outside social stressors & offer slightly new environment.” The request to move J92476 to another location had been made on July 24. The entry continues: “Patient alert, appears much more uneasy in new environment [with] lots of movement in cage. Purse string loose but intact.”

August 12: “Purse string intact. Normal behavior in cage.”

August 16: “Playful, opened cage to get bowl & he decided to start helping himself around me to get out of the cage.”

August 17: “Purse string visible but grossly distended. Great attitude & normal mannerisms.”

August 19: “Very friendly.”

August 27, 1998: “Aggressive movements towards neighboring male #J94233 in cage #7. No signs of prolapse. Anesthetized @ 4 PM to reassess rectal tissue & ensure purse string gone. Nice weight gain. Normal abdominal palpation. No signs suture material & rectal mucosa not inflamed. Case closed.”

There is another lapse in the daily records.

April 16, 1999. J92476 is almost six and a half years old. “Noted rectal prolapse (fresh) on observation. ~21 cm.” Another purse string suture, another rash noted on his stomach.

On April 20 he was anesthetized again and examined. The suture was intact, he had a slight fever, and they cleaned his teeth again.

On May 11 the suture was removed.

March 8, 2000: “patient needs canine teeth cutdowns redone. All four canine teeth cutdown but upper canines (maxillary) are not cut short enough & all canines have cracks in the composite.”

July 4, 2000: “Blood present in cage, mainly on the floor of the cage. Minor trauma to [left] hand.” A monkey in an adjoining cage is claimed to have bitten J92476. His hand is treated.

The final record we have for J92476 is from August 25, 2000. He had the pulp removed from his four canines, the teeth flattened further, and filled with a composite material. He was placed on soft foods for 24 hours.

We also know that J92476 was transferred to Shiu-Lok Hu from William Morton’s study. Hu is studying HIV. He writes on a federal database: “Four of five Macaca nemestrina that were infected with HIV-2287 and treated with d4T (Stavudine) remain in good health 3 1/2 years after drug therapy was discontinued (in July 1997), despite persistent virus infection. The results of in vitro tests suggest that the CD8+ cell population has a role in maintaining the low levels of circulating virus and the normal CD4+ cell numbers in the peripheral blood. One macaque did develop depletion of the CD4+ cell population and was euthanatized. The remaining macaques will continue to be monitored for clinical status and progression to disease. Two macaques are assigned to this project as normal controls.”

The above report was originally published by the Primate Freedom Project in early 2001. At the time of the report, J92476 was  still alive and was one of the remaining four monkeys reported to be “in good health.” This particular research grant, 5P51RR00166-390040, expired on April 30, 2001. No further records had been obtained regarding J92476, so his life at that point on remains a mystery. It is highly likely that he is not alive at this point.

Advertisements

Pig-Tailed Macaque, #J90299

11 Jan

In Memory of : Male, Pig-Tailed Macaque, #J90299

Born: September 18, 1990
Killed: September 8, 1999

J90299 was born on September 18, 1990 at Medical Lake, Washington, once a human prison. Medical Lake was remodeled and used as a primate-breeding center for a number of years. It is now abandoned. One can only imagine the horror that those walls have seen.

At birth, J90299 weighed little more than a pound. His mother rejected him when he was only two days old. He was treated for bites and abrasions to his face. He was sent to the Washington  Primate Research Center in Seattle.

For eight months, he was held alone in a cage. In the wild, macaques live in dynamic social groups and interact with a complex and rich environment. This solitary confinement was a lonely and stressful time.

On J90299’s first birthday he was placed in a “group (cage or room),” where he remained for four years.

He was removed from the group and treated for a traumatic injury to his second finger. He was discharged and returned to the group on January 4, 1996. But he didn’t remain there for long.

On February 2, 1996 he was again removed from his group and placed in a cage by himself. Then on the 15th was put on a truck for shipment to another lab.

But J90299 wasn’t sent anywhere, and instead, on the 15th he was taken off the truck and placed in a single animal cage, sick with diarrhea. He spent the last 3 ½ years of his life caged all alone. During this time he suffered acute inflammation of the mucous membranes of his eye, mouth, and nose. He endured an apicoectomey, the removal of an infection from the tip of the tooth root (similar to a root canal), and then on September 8, 1999, J90299 was killed. He was 8.97 years old. His death was described as “Euthanasia, experimental.” He weighed only seven pounds.

During his short, lonely life, J90299:

– was rejected by his mother;
– was moved 44 times;
– had blood drawn 15 times;
– spent over four years alone in a cage;
– was killed.

The people who “used” him were:

– Edward Clark
– Laura Newell
– Jeffery Wine
– Lakshmi Gaur

The above report was originally published by the Primate Freedom Project, from the medical records obtained  from Amy MacCausland. We thank her for her persistence and concern.

Baboon, #A92025

11 Jan

In Memory of : Female, Baboon, #A92025

Born January 1, 1990
Died June 26, 2000

Baboon #A92025 was manufactured at the Buckshire Corporation which sold her to the University of Washington. During her short, lonely life she was subjected to various protocols including experiments that caused permanent biological changes in her.

She was used as a “dummy” for blood drawing in 1992. Her bones were permanently altered in the “Bone Marrow Engraftment…” experiments.

Her biology was permanently changed again in 1993 when human stem cells were introduced into her system. She was also used as a breeding machine in November of 1999, just seven months before she was killed.

In March of 1996 one researcher noted that she was suffering from nosebleeds, sneezing, coughing, and abnormal discharge. However, to push a new protocol into action, an alternate researcher noted a day later that Baboon #A92025 was healthy and the experiments were to be continued as planned.

She had blood drawn 26 times. She was moved 52 times. And, she spent approximately six years in a single cage with no interaction with others. She was euthanized on June 26, 2000 after 9 ½ years of enslavement and torture.

She spent only broken, shifting moments with other caged and tortured primates adding up to a total of approximately 3.3 years of exposure to her own species. The rest of the time she spent alone, including a two-month stint being tethered.

Tethering is a technique that is used to infuse (inject) and sample (suck out) fluids in an unrestrained animal over an extended period of time. It truly turns them into a living laboratory. Typically, a monkey will undergo surgery that implants tubes (cannula or catheters) into the organ or cavity of interest. The tubes may be tunneled under the skin and exit through the animal’s back into a protected flexible metal hose. The animal is then fitted with a jacket to keep him or her from being able to touch the exit site. The tubes then attach to a port in the cage, so that the animal might appear to be on a leash or a tether. Tethered animals sometimes develop sores under their jackets from chaffing. In nearly every case, tethered animals are singly housed, which may be the worse thing that can be done to these highly social animals.
In her life, A92025:

– Was taken from her mother and had her infant taken from her;
– Was moved 52 times;
– Had blood drawn 26 times;
– Spent over six years alone in a cage; and was killed

The people who used her are:

– Dr. Robert G. Andrews
– Dr. John Weyhrich
– Dr. Laurence Shields
– Dr. David Anderson

The above report was originally published by the Primate Freedom Project from the medical records obtained by a UW student by an open records law request.